Photography

PS or LR which is your post processing software? And why?

Photoshop vs. Lightroom: Why I Prefer Photoshop for Post Processing

So the question is, do you use Photoshop or Lightroom for post processing, which software do you use? And why I personally prefer to use Photoshop or couple of reasons? First reason is that when I started my business Lightroom was not even a thing, it didn't even exist. And the way that you process your raw images was Adobe camera raw. So, Adobe Lightroom is actually built off of the platform. Of adobe camera raw. So couple of things creature habit because I learned how to post process on Photoshop. That's what I stick with and all the things that you can do in Lightroom, you know, in terms of processing the Roz and you can sink and all of that you can do that in Adobe camera raw. So I tend to like stick with that but on top of that, I have more control with my editing in Photoshop, so it's just a lot easier for me to open up the images. Has using Adobe Bridge. Bring them into. They just automatically open up, adobe camera raw and then if I need to do any additional editing, I just bring it into Photoshop. So, easy peasy. I find it a lot easier than using my room, but I just think like, your mileage may vary. So hope that helps.

I prefer to use Photoshop over Lightroom for post-processing because it was the software I learned on and it offers more control when editing images.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/j1wez9onluiear6znbng.vtt

The post-processing software I prefer to use is Photoshop. There are a couple of reasons for this choice. Firstly, when I started my business, Lightroom didn't exist. The software used for processing raw images was Adobe Camera Raw, which Lightroom is built upon. So, out of habit, I stuck with Photoshop since that's where I learned to post-process.

Additionally, I find that Photoshop gives me more control over my editing. I can easily open images using Adobe Bridge, which automatically opens them in Adobe Camera Raw. If I need to do any additional editing, I can seamlessly bring the image into Photoshop. This workflow works well for me and feels easier than using Lightroom.

However, it's important to note that everyone's preferences may vary. Some photographers may find Lightroom to be their preferred software. Ultimately, it depends on personal preference and what works best for your specific needs.

How do I correct for chromatic aberration?

Get rid of chromatic aberration in post-processing!

How do I correct for chromatic aberration? Now I'm not sure if you mean before you snap the shutter or after so I'm just going to assume we're talking about after the image is captured and you notice that you've got some images that have a little bit of the purple you know fringe happening. So there are several ways that you can do I'm sure several different software. I'm gonna talk about Adobe Camera Raw and within Adobe Camera Raw there's a slider where you can easily just slide it on out of there and it's totally fixed and I believe the same slider exists in Adobe Lightroom as well. So that's how I fix it if I see it after the fact. So hope that helps.

To correct for chromatic aberration after the image is captured, you can use the slider in Adobe Camera Raw or Adobe Lightroom to quickly fix it.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/qki63qujc8kicy3w8zvn.vtt

To correct for chromatic aberration after capturing an image, you can use software such as Adobe Camera Raw or Adobe Lightroom. In Adobe Camera Raw, there is a slider specifically designed to address chromatic aberration. By sliding this slider, you can easily remove the purple fringing or other color aberrations. The same slider is also available in Adobe Lightroom. Simply adjust the slider to correct the chromatic aberration and eliminate the unwanted color fringing.

The Limit of Photoshop: Personal Judgment is Key

How much Photoshop is too much? Personal question really. I'm saying meaning personal to you. Only you can decide how much Photoshop is too much. When it really when it comes down to it, it doesn't matter what other people think if they feel Photoshop is too much when they look at your work because it's work that they didn't create. Now if I were to look at it just from my own perspective how much Photoshop is too much is when the Photoshop takes away from the intent that I meant to create. If it takes away what I was hoping to convey with the image that I captured. So sometimes you know if you're editing a picture and you're just you know you find yourself looking at it too long you may just kind of go overboard based on your own expectations because remember that that's key. What is your expectation? So if I'm too far off the mark from what I actually wanted that's when I know you probably took it a little bit too far but that may not have been the intent you know that other people may want. They may look at something that I've created it's like oh if I would have taken that I would have not photoshopped it the same way she would have done and that's fair for someone else to feel that way but I think in order to kind of create a style and be I guess known for the work that you create you got to be consistent. So if your photoshopping is consistent no one can tell you that it's too much. Hope that helps.

Only you can decide how much Photoshop is too much. If you are consistently photoshopping your images to match your desired expectations, then no one can tell you that it's too much.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/g7bdzw9dn8ha36hvkssj.vtt

Determining how much Photoshop is too much is a personal question. Only you can decide what feels right for your work. Other people's opinions on whether Photoshop is excessive or not are irrelevant because they didn't create the work.

From my perspective, Photoshop becomes excessive when it detracts from the intended message or impact of the image. If it takes away from what you were hoping to convey or goes too far beyond your expectations, then it may be too much. However, it's important to remember that everyone has different preferences and expectations.

Creating a consistent style is key to being recognized for your work. If your use of Photoshop is consistent and aligns with your artistic vision, then no one can tell you it's too much.

Ultimately, trust your own judgment and strive to create work that resonates with your intended message and style.

Mastering the Art: Editing a Photo in Minutes or Crafting Perfection in Seconds

So the question is, how long does it take you to edit a photo? So you're going to get a lot of different answers on this, but I'll give you what my perspective is. It really depends on what I'm trying to achieve. For me, I'm a portrait photographer and I'm taking pictures for clients to review and then they decide what they want to place an order for their walls or place in an album. So I guarantee client seemed they see, 40 different pictures, fully edited. So sometimes I can edit an entire photo session and it only take me an hour sometimes, I'm taking one picture and I'm changing something. Creating light in post something. That's gives me a like a little bit more of an elaborate edit. Then that can take me maybe 30 minutes for just one picture. But here's the thing, I photograph with a lot of intention, meaning the magic kind of happens, really when I snap the shutter and not like after. So sometimes people like want to take pictures and they want to have, you know, the goal of having it all technically correct. Yes, that's what we all want to have. Have. But I'm also thinking of other things that I want that image to look like. And a lot of that happens when I'm snapping the shutter there are times when I Maze Look at a scene and say you know what, I can do this in post. So the intention of me capturing that picture happens and post so I know what I'm doing before I stuff the shutter so it really kind of varies really what you want to do. But the beauty of post-processing is the world is your oyster hope that helps.

Editing a photo can take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour, depending on the desired outcome. It is important to consider the intention of the photo when taking the shot in order to have the best result when editing.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/rdbgk4ij09ykwvvlge7v.vtt

The time it takes to edit a photo varies depending on the desired outcome. As a portrait photographer, my editing time depends on the specific needs of my clients. When editing an entire photo session, it can take around an hour to complete. However, if I'm working on a single photo and making more elaborate edits, such as creating light in post-processing, it may take around 30 minutes.

It's important to note that I approach photography with intention. I believe that the magic happens when I capture the image, not just during the editing process. While technical correctness is important, I also consider the desired look and feel of the image when taking the shot. Sometimes, I may intentionally capture a scene knowing that I can enhance it in post-processing.

Ultimately, the time spent on editing depends on the specific goals and intentions for the photo. Post-processing offers endless possibilities, allowing for creative exploration.

When you're studying your images in an effort to grow, what thought process do you use?

Uncovering Growth: Thought Process for Studying Images

When you're studying your images, in an effort to grow, what thought process do you use? And I love this question because it's something that I tend to do, at least from a regular basis, I tend to do it at the beginning of every year. So I go back, I will go back probably the last maybe three or four years of images that I love and see what I still like about it, what I don't like about it. I tend to compare it to my newer work or the work that I did over the past year. And then I just start to balance it. And then sometimes I think about, oh, you should have did this differently. Or, ah, now I see why you were doing things that way in let's say 2017. And now how my work has evolved now in this past 2022. So now I'm moving into 2023, I tend to assess it from the perspective of, do I still like my work? Do I want something to change? Am I still inspired by me? If the answer is no, then I really start looking and comparing old work to new work. If the answer is yes, then again, I still compare old work to new work, but I wanna see if there's something that I would change. If the answer is yes, then I get on it. If the answer is no, I still tweak a little bit, but comparing my old work to my new work is my definite thought process. So hope that helps.

My thought process for studying my images and trying to grow is to compare my old work to my new work and assess if there is something I would change. If yes, then I get on it. If no, then I still tweak a little bit.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/ov2b5ecnn9sou5vbuxdf.vtt

When studying my images to facilitate growth, I have a specific thought process that I follow. I find this question intriguing because it aligns with my regular practice, which I typically do at the beginning of each year.

First, I go back and review images from the past three or four years that I truly love. I analyze what still resonates with me and what aspects I may not like anymore. I compare these older images to my more recent work, assessing how my style and approach have evolved.

During this process, I reflect on why I made certain choices in the past and how my work has progressed over time. I consider if there are any aspects I would have done differently or if I now understand the reasoning behind my decisions from previous years.

As I move into a new year, such as 2023, I evaluate whether I still enjoy my work and if there are any changes I desire. If the answer is no, I continue comparing old and new work to identify any potential areas for improvement. If the answer is yes, I still engage in the comparison process, seeking opportunities for refinement.

Overall, my thought process revolves around comparing my old work to my new work, allowing me to assess my growth and make adjustments as needed.

Do you like to caption/title your images or do you let the photo speak for itself?

Letting Photos Speak: No Words, Just Interpretations.

Do you like to caption or title your images? Or do you let the photos speak for itself? You know, that's a really, really good question. So I'm not sure if I'm going to be that Oddball here. I never title my pictures unless I have to and some way. So like, for example, if someone asks me to submit an image and, you know, for something right and then they'll say, well, you know, can you title it? I I'm always at Alaska. Words and what to choose. And usually, the title is the most obvious thing about the picture. But I'm definitely let the photo speak for itself because, you know, I think, you know, my images, I think really, everybody's images are going to speak different things to different people, and I like people to make their own interpretations of what I create. So, the way I may see a picture that I've, you know, created the next person may see something totally different and I just find it. That's one of the beauties. T, the beautiful things about photography is that you can come up with your own interpretation. So I try not to guide people and what they see with them within the pictures that I take and just let you know, the photo speak for itself.

I usually let my photos speak for itself, rather than title them. I feel that everyone can have their own interpretation of what they see in the photos and I don't want to guide them with a title.

https://assets.anyquestion.com/raw/upload/cglaq3hbmyzhjlyc84bh.vtt

Do I like to caption or title my images, or do I let the photos speak for themselves? That's a great question. Personally, I rarely title my pictures unless it's necessary. If someone asks me to submit an image and requests a title, I struggle to find the right words. Usually, the title ends up being the most obvious description of the photo.

I prefer to let the photo speak for itself. I believe that images can evoke different emotions and interpretations for different people. I enjoy when individuals make their own connections and meanings from my work. Each person may see something entirely unique in the same image, and that's one of the beautiful aspects of photography. I don't want to guide or influence what others see in my pictures. I let the photo speak for itself and allow viewers to form their own interpretations.

Audrey Woulard answers your Photography questions. See all the advice Audrey Woulard has and get answers to your own Photography questions.

Follow me on AnyQuestion

Audrey Woulard is the owner and photographer of Kids And the City (KATC). She has been a full-time professional photographer for 20 years, specializing in fashion-forward high school seniors and families seeking something different. Her education website for Photographers is www.awteaches.com